OSNews > Thread > "RE[3]: private structure fields" by sanctus

Linked by Quentin Hartman on Mon 14th Jul 2008 08:46 UTC, submitted by makkus

At last week's Guadec meeting, Kristian Rietveld delivered the GTK+ "state of the union" report. GTK+ is the multi-platform toolkit behind a number of popular applications and, perhaps most well known, the Gnome Desktop environment for Linux. Read the full report here.

5 40 Comment(s)

http://osne.ws/fgq

Thread beginning with comment 322831
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

RE[3]: private structure fields

by sanctus on Mon 14th Jul 2008 15:03 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: private structure fields"

Member since:
2005-08-31

is Qt not bind to Cocoa on OS X? Never tried, but isn't possible to code OS X application in C,C++ or Obj-C in xcode?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: private structure fields

by YEPHENAS on Mon 14th Jul 2008 15:23 in reply to "RE[3]: private structure fields"

Member since:
2008-07-14

is Qt not bind to Cocoa on OS X? Never tried, but isn't possible to code OS X application in C,C++ or Obj-C in xcode?

With pure C you can code Carbon applications, but Carbon is outdated. Then there is Objective C++: most of your program will be C++ but the Cocoa calls will be with the Smalltalk-like "Objective-syntax". Perhaps that's what Qt does. The Java bindings had difficulties mapping Cocoa to Java and are abandoned now. And even Ruby or Python bindings look strange, like: myObject.setValue_forKey_(u"foo", u"bar")

Edited 2008-07-14 15:24 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2