Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 14th Jul 2008 21:55 UTC, submitted by SK8T
Linux Linux creator Linus Torvalds has released version 2.6.26 of the Linux kernel after a lengthy three-month development stretch since the 2.6.25 release involving nine release candidates. In announcing the release on the Linux Kernel Mailing List, Torvalds said the 87 days since 2.6.25 makes 2.6.26 a longer-than-usual release cycle. Torvalds said the changes from release candidate (RC) 9 are small, with the bulk (80 percent) being documentation updates.
Thread beginning with comment 322915
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
KVM on S/390...
by madcrow on Mon 14th Jul 2008 23:41 UTC
madcrow
Member since:
2006-03-13

IBM's got to be a bit miffed at the moment, considering that this is in direct competition with their own proprietary hypervisor to run dozens of Linux instances under.

RE: KVM on S/390...
by jwwf on Tue 15th Jul 2008 00:10 in reply to "KVM on S/390..."
jwwf Member since:
2006-01-19

IBM's got to be a bit miffed at the moment, considering that this is in direct competition with their own proprietary hypervisor to run dozens of Linux instances under.


Doubt it. Most mainframe shops probably run more than linux. All IBM has to do is say zOS is only supported under VM, and that's that.

I suppose there are some linux-only mainframe shops, but I need to see a couple of cases where $100,000 per processor hardware makes sense in a linux-only shop before I believe it's more than just a good way for IBM salespeople to make Porsche payments.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE: KVM on S/390...
by Rahul on Tue 15th Jul 2008 00:26 in reply to "KVM on S/390..."
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06

Huh? Do you realize that IBM has contributed the patches? Read the actual commit messages? IBM has been contributing in the past to Xen too. When virtualization becomes more of a commodity, they still get to make money from services from a expanded market.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: KVM on S/390...
by jwwf on Tue 15th Jul 2008 01:55 in reply to "RE: KVM on S/390..."
jwwf Member since:
2006-01-19

What I don't get is what it is actually for. I mean, if you paid for the mainframe for the usual reasons, it seems natural you wouldn't mind paying for VM, which has been doing the job for 30 years. Heck, if IBM thought it would matter, sales wise, they could give VM away.

Not that I care that they did it, I just wonder who is going to use it. But then I feel that people read too much into the whole 390 Linux thing: IBM had no viable UNIX for the mainframe, some customers have the mainframe as their strategic platform and wanted to consolidate a little UNIX here and there, and Linux was convenient. Some see it a crown jewel in OSS acceptance (because mainframe is teh awesome!), but I don't really get how enabling one of the world's most closed computing systems is consistent with OSS goals. But then again, I don't buy mainframes ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3