Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 14th Jul 2008 23:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 322941
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You might want to compare it with
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/User-Group-HOWTO-1.html
Actually, no. In the OLS keynote address, Greg Korah-Hartman of Novell made the claim that Linux has surpassed NetBSD in its support for hardware. (http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html)
Still, I have to admire the NetBSD guys for creating a kernel that's been ported to as much hardware as it has, and with 1/1000th (plus or minus my imagination) of the developers as Linux. Plus, I love their slogan: "Of course it runs NetBSD." Apt.
Edit: Whoops. That would be the same person making the same claim at an early presentation he's given.
Edited 2008-07-15 05:15 UTC
Actually, no. In the OLS keynote address, Greg Korah-Hartman of Novell made the claim that Linux has surpassed NetBSD in its support for hardware. (http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html)
Great slideshow thanks.
Yea, my guess is NetBSD outdoes it...
It doesn't apparently by most counts, but Linux is only a kernel, NetBSD is a full operating system. This means that you can build the same userland for all supported platforms. Or even better, you can cross-compile NetBSD on one platform for virtually all platforms. And cross-compiling is initiated by just one build.sh command.






Member since:
2005-07-20
Yea, my guess is NetBSD outdoes it...