Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 14th Jul 2008 23:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 322967
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But only 6 contributions!? Aaaaah, something's got to be wrong here.
You are correct, there is something wrong.
http://blog.phunnypharm.org/2008/07/canonical-and-linux-kernel.html
That is not to say that Canonical contributes nearly as much as the Redhat team or others, but the numbers GregKH gave are inaccurate.






Member since:
2005-07-26
position. GKH was very emphatic that 'Canonical does not give back to the community'.
Currently Launchpad is holding more than 1700 kernel related bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux
Maybe Canonical doesn't directly pay kernel devs, but Ubuntu endorses lots of kernel development. Canonical is just an easy target because they're so well-known. But they're definitely not the same kind of company as Red Hat and shouldn't be viewed as such. Seeing their "Engineering" web page clearly proves that they're just getting started.
http://www.canonical.com/services/engineering
But seeing how they boast themselves about contributing to Linux tastes a little wrong, if GHK is just half right about his claims:
http://www.canonical.com/aboutus/contributions
But only 6 contributions!? Aaaaah, something's got to be wrong here.