Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 16th Jul 2008 17:24 UTC, submitted by wakeupneo
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Google vowed that its Linux-based Android mobile platform would empower enthusiasts and amateur developers, but today we have seen compelling evidence that this is an empty promise. Third-party Android application developers, who have grown increasingly frustrated with the lack of SDK updates, were shocked to discover that Google has been secretly making new versions of the Android SDK available to the Android Developer Challenge (ADC) finalists under non-disclosure agreements.
Thread beginning with comment 323215
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
have to wait
by backdoc on Wed 16th Jul 2008 17:39 UTC
backdoc
Member since:
2006-01-14

Guess we have to wait and see what their intentions are/were. ATM, I can't recall the name of another open source project that did something similar. Never the less, their position was that they wanted to get the development rolling in a certain direction before they released the code. IIRC, they came through as promised. Possibly, Google will come through, as well.

RE: have to wait
by robilad on Wed 16th Jul 2008 23:57 in reply to "have to wait"
robilad Member since:
2006-01-02

You haven't seen an open source project pull such a stunt because Android is not an open source project.

Let me rephrase that as 'not yet' an open source project, to leave some room for hope that it may be one some day.

Edited 2008-07-17 00:06 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: have to wait
by MamiyaOtaru on Thu 17th Jul 2008 00:06 in reply to "have to wait"
MamiyaOtaru Member since:
2005-11-11

"[iI can't recall the name of another open source project that did something similar. Never the less, their position was that they wanted to get the development rolling in a certain direction before they released the code. IIRC, they came through as promised.[/i]"

Sounds a bit like Novell and XGL. They did come through, but then other options presented themselves. But yeah, Google could be doing the same thing. Remains to be seen.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: have to wait
by sbergman27 on Thu 17th Jul 2008 01:59 in reply to "RE: have to wait"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Sounds a bit like Novell and XGL. They did come through, but then other options presented themselves.

And quickly supplanted it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: have to wait
by apoclypse on Thu 17th Jul 2008 06:11 in reply to "have to wait"
apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

Are you talking about XGL and compiz maybe?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: have to wait
by backdoc on Thu 17th Jul 2008 18:17 in reply to "RE: have to wait"
backdoc Member since:
2006-01-14

I don't remember. I just knew it rang a bell for me. I probably shouldn't have even posted when I didn't have any more facts than that. I just have my doubts that Google would double cross the open source community. And, that was my point. I could be wrong. But, I doubt it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2