Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Wed 16th Jul 2008 22:22 UTC
Intel After a few delays and tons of rumors, Intel's fifth generation notebook platform has arrived. Centrino 2, previously known as Montevina, comes with with it a line of new Core 2 Duo processors, upgraded graphics and Wi-Fi, and DDR3 RAM. One of the first notebooks to be released with Centrino 2 is Lenovo's newest ThinkPad, the X200. This is the update to the X61 which not only had all the new Centrino gear, but moves to a widescreen display.
Thread beginning with comment 323272
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Parry Hotter
by Parry Hotter on Wed 16th Jul 2008 23:00 UTC
Parry Hotter
Member since:
2007-07-20

Perhaps a bit OT, but is it just me who prefers laptop displays with 4:3 (or 5:4) aspect ratio to 16:10? They're getting increasingly difficult to find nowadays. I want height, not width.

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by amjith on Wed 16th Jul 2008 23:08 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
amjith Member since:
2005-07-08

I want height, not width.

I agree. I have my desktop monitor in the portrait mode so I can look at more lines. I think the wide screen caters for the multi-taskers but for ppl who want to work on one program it is big distraction.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by MamiyaOtaru on Wed 16th Jul 2008 23:46 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
MamiyaOtaru Member since:
2005-11-11

You're not the only one. But the widescreen crowd doesn't take it too well when I express a preference for tallscreen.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by bosco_bearbank on Thu 17th Jul 2008 01:21 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
bosco_bearbank Member since:
2005-10-12

It's not just you. Given enough vertical pixels, I can accept the extras in the horizontal direction. 1680x1050 on my desktop is perfect. I wonder how it'd look on a 15.4 inch laptop screen.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by Parry Hotter
by reldruh on Thu 17th Jul 2008 04:32 in reply to "RE: Comment by Parry Hotter"
reldruh Member since:
2007-02-05

That's the resolution my 15.4" laptop runs at and I shudder when I think about smaller sizes. I would probably get used to it again but everything is so crisp right now, not difficult to read at all and much more pleasant than other laptops I've used.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by bousozoku on Thu 17th Jul 2008 07:14 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23

Perhaps a bit OT, but is it just me who prefers laptop displays with 4:3 (or 5:4) aspect ratio to 16:10? They're getting increasingly difficult to find nowadays. I want height, not width.


It depends on whether I'm editing code or photos. For photos, the width is necessary to give the tools and palettes room. Whatever the case, please give me a matte display and a decent resolution. 1280x800 on a 15.4 inch display is hardly worth having. 1440x900 is a bit better.

Glad to see that we have a new set of processors for the games to suck dry. Last year's games might have a fighting chance soon without breaking the bank.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by DigitalAxis on Thu 17th Jul 2008 15:39 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
DigitalAxis Member since:
2005-08-28

I've found that widescreens work pretty well if you can settle on a vertical layout for the toolbars, as in this picture. http://www.chara.gsu.edu/~riedel/images/DigitalAxis.jpg
You lose some of the width, but gain back some of the height (of course, that was my old laptop with the 1920x1200 display).

Personally, I don't think 16:10 is a good idea because the canonical widescreen is 16:9. Sure, all that means is you've got black bars, but why do you need them? Only recently (with the new Acer Blu-Ray laptops) is anyone doing that.

Edited 2008-07-17 15:39 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by zombie process on Thu 17th Jul 2008 16:06 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
zombie process Member since:
2005-07-08

Nope. I'm right there with you.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by unoengborg on Thu 17th Jul 2008 18:16 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
unoengborg Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes, I have to agree. Hight is much more important than width unless you are dealing with video.

On the other hand on these small notebooks, there is another size to take into account, and that is the size of the keyboard.If the computer is too narrow, it can't hold a normal sized keyboard with the result that they get hard or at least slow to type on.

So, if a wider screen allows for a wider, more normal sized keyboard. I think this a good thing, at least as long as the screen still is reasonably high.

BTW, the screen of the X200 is actually higher thatn that of most X60 models that usually had a 768x1024 pixel screen.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Comment by Parry Hotter
by abraxas on Thu 17th Jul 2008 22:37 in reply to "Comment by Parry Hotter"
abraxas Member since:
2005-07-07

Perhaps a bit OT, but is it just me who prefers laptop displays with 4:3 (or 5:4) aspect ratio to 16:10? They're getting increasingly difficult to find nowadays. I want height, not width.


I have a T60 which is one of the last Thinkpads with a 4:3 display (I think it is the last T series with a 4:3 aspect ratio). I prefer the 4:3 laptop LCDs but you are right they are harder to find now. Not only that but try finding a slipcase for a non-widescreen laptop. In my search I have found none that snugly fit a 14 inch 4:3 Thinkpad.

Edited 2008-07-17 22:38 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2