Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 21st Jul 2008 14:35 UTC, submitted by Thom_Holwerda
Thread beginning with comment 323852
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: F... rickey Apple
by Ford Prefect on Mon 21st Jul 2008 15:39
in reply to "RE[3]: F... rickey Apple"
Member since:2006-01-16
Member since:2006-11-12
You do realize that patents help protect small companies, too, right?
Patents have nothing to do with this situation/case.
From the Mac world article: "Apple contends Psystar's owners are aware of the end-user license agreement... and that installing OS X on its Open Computer constitutes a breach of contract... Apple argues that the end result of unauthorized use of its software and intellectual property is damaging to its brand."
Apple does not claim that a patent has been violated, they claim breach of private contract and "damage to their brand."
Edited 2008-07-21 15:56 UTC
RE[5]: F... rickey Apple
by javiercero1 on Mon 21st Jul 2008 16:32
in reply to "RE[4]: F... rickey Apple"
Member since:2005-11-10
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-03-23
You do realize that patents help protect small companies, too, right?
Edited 2008-07-21 15:17 UTC