Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Thu 24th Jul 2008 09:35 UTC, submitted by amjith
Thread beginning with comment 324330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Interesting read...
by RandomGuy on Thu 24th Jul 2008 12:46
in reply to "RE: Interesting read..."
Well, I found these sentences rather odd:
"Flash is very fast at reading and writing data, like DRAM [...]But unlike either alternative, Flash requires no power to remember data."
Last time I checked RAM was about 100x faster than Flash and HDDs still had higher burst speeds and didn't require power to keep data - only for reads and writes.
I guess he could have said "For the typical use case (lots of small, random writes and reads) Flash is faster and more efficient than HDDs".
Of course, that doesn't sound nearly as snappy 





Member since:
2006-12-18
He's right in saying storage is going to change a lot in the next few years.
Just a shame his blurb is full of inaccuracies and misinformation.