Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jul 2008 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 324635
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ah no. Just because a company is bust, does not mean that someone *else* does not own the trade secrets, patents, trade mark, and code etc. Quite often, that will stop say, Microsoft, or others, from being able to develop them any further.
Microsoft does a pretty good job of it - sure, they're not perfect, but Linux isn't either - DON'T even get me started. I'm sick and tired of blind Linuz zealots protecting Linux and all its myriad of problems, and then bashing Microsoft at the smallest of issues.
Dave
Microsoft does a pretty good job of it - sure, they're not perfect, but Linux isn't either - DON'T even get me started. I'm sick and tired of blind Linuz zealots protecting Linux and all its myriad of problems, and then bashing Microsoft at the smallest of issues.
Dave
Yeah Blue Screens are a small issue. You seem to have avoided the part about including the faulty drivers with their OS distribution. If they distribute it, they should have acqired the rights to fix it. BAD BUSINESS MODEL




Member since:
2006-12-16
Ah no. Just because a company is bust, does not mean that someone *else* does not own the trade secrets, patents, trade mark, and code etc. Quite often, that will stop say, Microsoft, or others, from being able to develop them any further.
Let's consider Creative as a solid example of lack of driver effort from the vendor. The soundblaster live! is a immensely popular piece of hardware, present in many millions of PCs around the world. Does Creative provide Vista drivers for it? No. Do they have any intentions of doing so? No. Why? Because they hope that you give up and basically buy a new product, meaning more profit for their greedy shareholders. It is about time that governments started legally overseeing the software and computer hardware industries, forcing manufacturers to provide drivers for reasonable periods of time, forcing them to port drivers to alternative operating systems. For a consumer product, software etc is almost entirely above the law. Does that really sound right?
Microsoft does a pretty good job of it - sure, they're not perfect, but Linux isn't either - DON'T even get me started. I'm sick and tired of blind Linuz zealots protecting Linux and all its myriad of problems, and then bashing Microsoft at the smallest of issues.
Dave