Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 22nd Jul 2008 01:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 324674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2008-01-20
You do make a valid point. However, there was no physical way of doing it from what I could see. I cant remember how I did it at the time, but knowing me, I would have tried opening the file as a stream too and waiting for EOF, and that wouldn't have worked (or I wouldn't have posted this). And I tested it on C and perl, and other languages, and all provided a means of reading them.
So evidently, they weren't reading the files properly (or they were doing it in a really advanced way).
Either way, I got put off by only 1 response, that acknowledged why the problem existed, but didn't even attempt to rectify it and making the functionality possible. Its no good telling a developer you cant do it because its a 0 size, but not trying to fix the problem by working around it (or offering new functions). And I was in no way inclined to help a project, whose only compiler at the time was totally closed.
Its interesting to hear about more problems though you are having. I think that ultimately, by the time they get their act together, they will also have to compete against C++ 0x and new generations of C# and Java.
That is just my personal opinion though anyway