Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Mon 28th Jul 2008 17:32 UTC, submitted by zaboing
Oracle and SUN In an interview with derStandard.at, Novell developer Michael Meeks talks mostly about Sun's lack of openness in regards to OpenOffice.org. He goes as far as stating that if Sun dropped out of OOo-development this "wouldn't be an entirely negative thing". He also goes on to talk about promoting Go-oo instead, and emphasizes the importance of breaking down the barriers between GNOME and KDE.
Thread beginning with comment 324830
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Novell - Sun
by evangs on Mon 28th Jul 2008 21:22 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Novell - Sun"
evangs
Member since:
2005-07-07

But that should not be necessary for an Open Source project. After all, why would a good open source project go through such great lengths to hide their affiliations?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Novell - Sun
by alexandru_lz on Mon 28th Jul 2008 21:29 in reply to "RE[3]: Novell - Sun"
alexandru_lz Member since:
2007-02-11

Maybe because it's the kind of thing about which most open source fans would instantly brag? From what I understand, Go-OO is realy OpenOffice, patched with a couple of foamy extras -- but instead of contributing to the OpenOffice.org codebase, Novell is making its own.

Frankly, this is very cool tactics from Microsoft. How long before we see a third OpenOffice "distribution"? How long before a fifth, each having a set of features that the others don't have, while lacking a couple of features on their own. This kind of thing just begs for another Get the facts campaign.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Novell - Sun
by KAMiKAZOW on Mon 28th Jul 2008 21:58 in reply to "RE[4]: Novell - Sun"
KAMiKAZOW Member since:
2005-07-06

instead of contributing to the OpenOffice.org codebase, Novell is making its own.

OpenOffice is still under LGPL. Novell developed VBA support long ago but Sun (for whatever reason) refused to include it.
For that reason many Linux distributions ship Novell's OpenOffice -- including Ubuntu.

How long before we see a third OpenOffice "distribution"?

See NeoOffice. It's an OpenOffice fork for Mac OS X. The fork was founded because the previous CEO of Sun refused to support anything related to Mac OS. Thanks to the patches developed by Novell for Go-OO, NeoOffice was the first native Mac application that supported OpenXML. NeoOffice is still the only native Intel Mac application that has VBA suport (MS Office 2008 dropped VBA support, even though it will return sometime in the future).

IMHO both companies, Sun and Novell, have make compromises. Sun has to loose its copyright assignment rules, while Novell should stop trying to integrate Mono into OpenOffice. OpenOffice already starts up to two virtual machines (Java and Python). Adding a third one is just a waste of computer resources.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[4]: Novell - Sun
by elsewhere on Tue 29th Jul 2008 04:04 in reply to "RE[3]: Novell - Sun"
elsewhere Member since:
2005-07-13

After all, why would a good open source project go through such great lengths to hide their affiliations?


It's hardly great lengths when a simple whois inquiry shows Novell owning the domain. It's not like they created off-shore shell companies to hide it, for crying out loud. But to your point, Why should a good open source project be judged on their affiliations? Because that's your implication.

Six of one, half dozen of the other. It doesn't matter either way.

Reply Parent Score: 6