Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 325210
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
what's with the stretch you're making..? No one ever claimed this. People want to run OSX on other hardware, Apple doesn't - and this is being tested now. "Apple having to help anyone" is derived from smoking your own crack... no-one needs Apple's help as it is being done without their help already this very moment.




Member since:
2005-11-10
If Psystar win, it will not mean that Apple has to make OS X work on other hardware. In fact, nothing will change at all.
_all_ it will mean is that _if_ you can get OS X working on other hardware, you can. There is nothing about this legal case that means Apple have to suddenly magically help you and make it easy.
Apple will not defend on EULA terms, it's irrelevant. They will attack on another basis, such as illegally re-using the OSX86 hacker's code and/or DMCA for modifying Apple's binaries.