Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Thu 31st Jul 2008 20:51 UTC, submitted by snydeq
While using an AMD Barcelona server to create a portable benchmarking kit, InfoWorld's Tom Yager discovered something unexpected: "I could incur variances in some benchmark tests ranging from 10 to 60 percent through combined manipulation of the server's BIOS settings, BIOS version, compiler flags, and OS release." Yager put this matter to AMD's performance engineers and was told he was seeing an effect widely known among CPU engineers, but seldom communicated to IT - that the performance envelope of a CPU is cast in silicon, but is sculpted in software. "Long before you lay hands on a server," Yager writes, "BIOS and OS engineers have reshaped its finely tuned logic in code, sometimes with the real intent of making it faster [...] sometimes to homogenize the server to flatten its performance relative to Intel's."
Thread beginning with comment 325221
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
ok, now i feel like its required to move on to coreboot or something as after getting to know stuff like that, one start to feel potentially cheated...
its like knowing that if you swap a chip or remove a part somewhere your vehicle gains maybe 60% more power.
as in, its cheaper to make the same parts and then sell it underclocked for those that cant or wont go for the premium products, then it is to make a specific part that cant perform any better...
Member since:2007-12-04
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-20
That's actually true. Vista (and Linux with no-tick) use the HPET (high performance event timer) which is hardware that has been present on many motherboards for years now, but often hidden from the OS by the BIOS.