To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It spans way back to newsgroups and is currently upheld by the behavior on many, many mailing lists. Many of these places it seems like at least half of your geek-cred is determined by how much of a belligerent asshole, rigid change-hater, or cranky old fart you can be. The often immature clueless pissyness on osnews is childs-play in comparison, generally speaking.
Don't accuse others of not reading what they are talking about in the very same minute you don't read what you are even quoting yourself (I refer to the second paragraph of my posting here)!
In my previous posting I justed added some general information about the laws in Germany. This is a special issue:
* not allowing modifications to the software is invalid
* not allowing to resell the software is invalid
* the combination of both presumbly gets valid again
I say presumbly as this is not as clear as it looks.
And sure, what they did may be illegal in other countries and even in Germany. You seem to be a little bit overeager at claiming facts though!
Edited 2008-08-01 05:17 UTC
... and you seem a bit over eager to let us know facts about German legislation, which in this case is incredibly pointless as the case is being tried in the USA.
Anyhow, once that Pysstar started reselling OSX they stop being a "customer" and started embarking in a commercial transaction. Modifying other people's IP and reselling is a whole new ball game than an EULA.
If pysstar thinks that apple will go the EULA route, then they are a bigger bunch of morons than I had anticipated. They are in for world of hurt.





Member since:
2005-07-06
But I assume it's true that this still excludes modifying the software and then selling it.
If you took the time to read, the issue isn't the reselling of the operating system - I've sold old copies of MacOS X without any repercussions from the auction site I did it through.
The issue at play is the fact that this vendor is selling a MODIFIED VERSION of Apple's software - that is the issue. They have hacked up a copy of MacOS X and resold it. Unless they have a special OEM agreement with Apple (which they don't), what they did was illegal.