Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 325284
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just a moment...
I'm not sure about this, but I thought Psystar were NOT modifying the OS, they were just modifying the BIOS. Isn't that correct?
If they simply put in a BIOS that Mac OS can work with, it should be possible to simply install an unmodified Mac OS version. So how would this be illegal after all?
I'm not sure about this, but I thought Psystar were NOT modifying the OS, they were just modifying the BIOS. Isn't that correct?
If they simply put in a BIOS that Mac OS can work with, it should be possible to simply install an unmodified Mac OS version. So how would this be illegal after all?
From their front page:
Leopard 10.5.4 - Business As Usual
Wednesday, 02 July 2008 09:41
The update for Leopard 10.5.4 is available through Leopard's native Software Update utility for users who have run our 10.5.3 scripted installer or whose computers shipped with 10.5.3 Leopard. Just click the Apple on the top-left of the screen and select "Software Update" to run the built-in Software Update application.
http://www.psystar.com/
That's a custom installer to bypass the Apple installer's standard procedures.
In short, they have a scripted Installer that simulates a genuine Macintosh Hardware Product capable of installing OS X and thus convincing the Installer.app from the retail DVD that it's installing on Apple Hardware.
They aren't going to win.
RE[2]: Modification Question
by alcibiades on Fri 1st Aug 2008 20:00
in reply to "RE: Modification Question"





Member since:
2007-11-29
Just a moment...
I'm not sure about this, but I thought Psystar were NOT modifying the OS, they were just modifying the BIOS. Isn't that correct?
If they simply put in a BIOS that Mac OS can work with, it should be possible to simply install an unmodified Mac OS version. So how would this be illegal after all?