Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Legal There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to take legal action against PsyStar, claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Thread beginning with comment 325324
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Mixed Feelings
by jziegler on Fri 1st Aug 2008 20:25 UTC in reply to "Mixed Feelings"
jziegler
Member since:
2005-07-14

Finally someone ;) .

Apple does not want OS X running on 3rd party hardware, because that would be a mess to support. And even without support, it would be bad for them from marketing POV. People would run it on unexpected HW combinations and sometimes it would not work. People would complain and an idea "OS X does not work on ...." would fly around.

Apple does not want that, I believe.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Mixed Feelings
by Ressev on Fri 1st Aug 2008 22:43 in reply to "RE: Mixed Feelings"
Ressev Member since:
2005-07-18

Finally someone ;) . Apple does not want OS X running on 3rd party hardware, because that would be a mess to support. And even without support, it would be bad for them from marketing POV. People would run it on unexpected HW combinations and sometimes it would not work. People would complain and an idea "OS X does not work on ...." would fly around. Apple does not want that, I believe.


Exactly. More to wit: "OSX does not work! OSX Sucks!" would fly around and would, ultimately, hurt Apple.

People would expect Apple to make OSX work with the infinate combinations that people expect Microsoft's OSs to work with.

Personally, I see nothing wrong with Apple's approach. They treat their set up as an application and as a result have a very decent reputation for having a 'solid' platform. Given that, why would they want to sully it by exposing themselves to such a headache? Course, I am a PC guy, but that has more to do with my current Music and Gaming software investments than anything else.

Reply Parent Score: 1