Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Jul 2008 22:03 UTC
Legal There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to take legal action against PsyStar, claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Thread beginning with comment 325333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: maybe
by stestagg on Fri 1st Aug 2008 22:51 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: maybe"
stestagg
Member since:
2006-06-03

My point was that programmers don't get paid royalties on the software they write. They are [usually] paid for the time they spend writing it.

But as it turns out, that wasn't a relevant point to my argument anyway, as the OP was suggesting that each track was bought from ITunes, so the royalties would have been paid. I was just being stupid

Reply Parent Score: 3