Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jul 2008 20:39 UTC, submitted by vege
Thread beginning with comment 325348
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Obviously not, because all the distributions choose pretty crappy, and interestingly, seemingly all the same, settings.
Odd how that seems to work to KDEs disadvantage huh. Just shift the blame.
Odd how that seems to work to KDEs disadvantage huh. Just shift the blame.
Que?
http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/fcreative.asp?edid=27844
http://vizzzion.org/?blogentry=824
http://vizzzion.org/images/blog/4.1-theming/4.1-whiteish.png
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mandriva-2009-Beta-1-Brings-KDE-4-1-...
http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/mandriva2009beta...
http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/mandriva2009beta...
Excuse me? You were saying?
Odd how that seems to work to KDEs disadvantage huh. Just shift the blame.
No blame shifting going on, because that's the way you get to see a new desktop - configured in a distribution. It's like getting to look at the first version of some Windows desktop components produced internally, and then bitching at Microsoft because it hasn't been integrated nicely into Windows with all the new font work that's been going on elsewhere.
Ergo, you just have no clue how this works.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Obviously not, because all the distributions choose pretty crappy, and interestingly, seemingly all the same, settings.
Odd how that seems to work to KDEs disadvantage huh. Just shift the blame.