
There are probably lots and lots of lawsuits going on every day in the technology world, and generally, they are quite uninteresting to all of us. Exceptions exist, of course, and the case of Apple and PsyStar is definitely one of them. It's a lawsuit that could test one of the most debated issues in the world of software: the EULA issue. To refresh your memory: PsyStar started offering Macintosh clones
earlier this year, which caused quite the uproar in the Mac community. Apple was silent on the issue at first, but a few weeks ago the company decided to
take legal action against PsyStar,
claiming PsyStar violated Apple's copyright and license agreements (EULAs), and motivated others to do the same. While several legal experts agree that Apple's EULA will
stand the test of court in The Netherlands, the situation in the US might be completely different. PsyStar seems prepared for the worst, as they have
hired lawyers from Carr & Ferrell LLP, a firm who successfully fought Apple in court over IP issues before. I'm breaking out the popcorn, because this is hopefully going to be a big one.
Member since:
2007-02-17
Nope, I have quite a few Macs here that can run MacOS X and weren't loaded with it when I bought them, and I could STILL buy the retail version of MacOS X and use it with them.
Read the License Terms. MacOS X Retail is NOT an upgrade, it's a full installable OS.
I even have Mac Clones that will run MacOS X that weren't sold with MacOS X on them.
Please don't post things that are wrong and add disinformation to the discussion. "
Nope again. A hacked mac isn't a mac and isn't licensed to run OSX. Just because it can run on other hardware doesn't mean that buying OSX retail isn't an upgrade. A real mac gives you the license to upgrade to any version of Mac OS you please, the cost of full OS gets rolled into the prices of the hardware. Having Mac OS anything entitles you to an upgrade, you have to remember that up until 10.4, Apple used to bundle OS9 with OSX.