Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 4th Aug 2008 14:35 UTC, submitted by Hakime
Thread beginning with comment 325682
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
well lightzone, raw therapee, bibble, etc are digital dark rooms they generally don't give you even basic drawing functions so they don't exist in the same headspace as the GIMP paint etc.
i admit inkscape, xara kind of poke a hole in my pithy summation or a broad problem BUT I feel my general point stands and is restated by Deadfishman here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?325659
To restate myself in a way i'm willing to defend:
"Much of the criticism directed towards The GIMP come from users who do not or should not need to use it."
that paragraph of my original post was just trying to point out that on Linux there is a "should not need to use it" problem.
i admit inkscape, xara kind of poke a hole in my pithy summation or a broad problem BUT I feel my general point stands and is restated by Deadfishman here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?325659
To restate myself in a way i'm willing to defend:
"Much of the criticism directed towards The GIMP come from users who do not or should not need to use it."
that paragraph of my original post was just trying to point out that on Linux there is a "should not need to use it" problem.
well lightzone, raw therapee, bibble, etc are digital dark rooms they generally don't give you even basic drawing functions so they don't exist in the same headspace as the GIMP paint etc.
i admit inkscape, xara kind of poke a hole in my pithy summation or a broad problem BUT I feel my general point stands and is restated by Deadfishman here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?325659
To restate myself in a way i'm willing to defend:
"Much of the criticism directed towards The GIMP come from users who do not or should not need to use it."
that paragraph of my original post was just trying to point out that on Linux there is a "should not need to use it" problem.
i admit inkscape, xara kind of poke a hole in my pithy summation or a broad problem BUT I feel my general point stands and is restated by Deadfishman here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?325659
To restate myself in a way i'm willing to defend:
"Much of the criticism directed towards The GIMP come from users who do not or should not need to use it."
that paragraph of my original post was just trying to point out that on Linux there is a "should not need to use it" problem.
Your post just made it seem like image editing in general on Linux was limited to the GIMP and it is not. It is probably the best raster editor for Linux but there are others and when it comes to vector graphics Linux actually has more than one very good editor.






Member since:
2006-02-04
well lightzone, raw therapee, bibble, etc are digital dark rooms they generally don't give you even basic drawing functions so they don't exist in the same headspace as the GIMP paint etc.
i admit inkscape, xara kind of poke a hole in my pithy summation or a broad problem BUT I feel my general point stands and is restated by Deadfishman here: http://www.osnews.com/thread?325659
To restate myself in a way i'm willing to defend:
"Much of the criticism directed towards The GIMP come from users who do not or should not need to use it."
that paragraph of my original post was just trying to point out that on Linux there is a "should not need to use it" problem.