Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 5th Aug 2008 19:14 UTC, submitted by AdamW
Thread beginning with comment 325691
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: And this is where it all went wrong
by fsckit on Tue 5th Aug 2008 21:09
in reply to "RE: And this is where it all went wrong"
I'm well aware of this. Just because it "can" be configured to do so, does not mean that is the standard way of doing so, or even a common way. My home workstation has 1GB of RAM and nearly every livecd that I've tried the load to RAM option on fails miserably. Except DSL, which can load on nearly anything recent.
The point is, a fracking installer should never ever ever ever need over 1GB of RAM.
I'm also aware that Mandriva and others provide install only cd sets. Again, just because it's one way to go does not mean it's common. My days of burning 3 to 6 CDs for a Linux install are over.
RE[3]: And this is where it all went wrong
by AdamW on Tue 5th Aug 2008 21:43
in reply to "RE[2]: And this is where it all went wrong"
RE[3]: And this is where it all went wrong
by rockwell on Tue 5th Aug 2008 22:21
in reply to "RE[2]: And this is where it all went wrong"







Member since:
2007-03-30
Didn't you just go wrong? A livecd OS could be configured to run the entire OS from system memory, whereas a different installed OS could be configured to run and page from disk, making worse use of the faster system memory. It is entirely possible to have a livecd OS run faster than an installed OS...