To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ahem, it is actually the other way around, I'm afraid.
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/04/math-markup-marked-down.html
More here: http://www.itwire.com/content/view/12608/1023/
Science doesn't accept Word 2007 documents. Nature magazine as well, same issue.
BTW: some governments' national standard document format is a format that MS Word can't produce:
http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2008/04/south-africa-ad.html
Edited 2008-08-07 11:16 UTC
Strange but true...A fair amount of our customers would only say they couldn't open the attachment. They didn't say they don't have PDF, but they say the computer asks what application to use to open the attachment (I concluded they don't have Acrobat Reader). I have visited customers whose computer are *really* old with CRT monitors and Windows 98. This is no invention.
PDF is a standard (PDF/A). While I won't fault a company for not wishing to use Acrobat Reader I will fault them for not at least installing some kind of PDF reader. It's not like theres nothing out there.
My personal opinion is that unless a document needs to be modified by the recipient it should be sent in a PDF form. Simplifies the process quite nicely in most cases I think.





Member since:
2006-03-24
You clients wouldn't accept PDF? Sure there might be some formatting issues between MS-Office and OpenOffice.org, but who has ever heard of an organisation which doesn't install a PDF reader as standard on all their desktops?
PDF is pretty much the most widespread document format on the web (if you don't count HTML). Methinks I smell a troll.