Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 5th Aug 2008 20:22 UTC, submitted by rlem6983
Thread beginning with comment 325764
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Consistency accross word processors
by JoeBuck on Tue 5th Aug 2008 23:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Consistency accross word processors"
RE[4]: Consistency accross word processors
by Liquidator on Wed 6th Aug 2008 06:52
in reply to "RE[3]: Consistency accross word processors"
RE[3]: Consistency accross word processors
by lemur2 on Thu 7th Aug 2008 11:05
in reply to "RE[2]: Consistency accross word processors"
Nature (or was it Science? always confuse the both) only accepts MS Word documents!!!
Ahem, it is actually the other way around, I'm afraid.
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/04/math-markup-marked-down.html
"Because of changes Microsoft has made in its recent Word release that are incompatible with our internal workflow, which was built around previous versions of the software, Science cannot at present accept any files in the new .docx format produced through Microsoft Word 2007, either for initial submission or for revision. Users of this release of Word should convert these files to a format compatible with Word 2003 or Word for Macintosh 2004 (or, for initial submission, to a PDF file) before submitting to Science."
More here: http://www.itwire.com/content/view/12608/1023/
Science doesn't accept Word 2007 documents. Nature magazine as well, same issue.
BTW: some governments' national standard document format is a format that MS Word can't produce:
http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2008/04/south-africa-ad.html
Edited 2008-08-07 11:16 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-22
Nature (or was it Science? always confuse the both) only accepts MS Word documents!!!