Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 9th Aug 2008 19:19 UTC
One of the common complaints regarding Microsoft is that the company has problems eating its own dog food. Even though it promoted Windows Presentation Foundation as the programming framework for building Windows and web applications, it so far failed to produce any significant WPF applications itself. None of Microsoft's major applications use WPF (Expression Design and Blend aren't major), which does not help in promoting it as the Next Big Thing. This may all change in the near future, as a small but extremely popular Microsoft application is about to make the switch to Windows Presentation Foundation: 
Thread beginning with comment 326336
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-01-03
I haven't worked with WPF personally. But I think you need to evaluate it on more criteria then how many resources it consumes and how fast it is (whatever that means). Other factors that should also influence an assessment of the technology is what kind of things can you do with it that you can't with older technologies? Does it allow fancy new transformations and widgits? Does it help to separate presentation from business logic? Is it easier to program? Design? API's?
So while I would like to see it run at least as fast as winforms or older technologies and it likely will consume more resources if it's doing more under the hood. If I were writing a windows application I would be more concerned about some of the points I raised in the previous paragraph than resources and some obscure metric of speed.