Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Aug 2008 00:10 UTC, submitted by superstoned
The dot reports on the new version of Qt, as discussed by Qt developers Simon Hausmann and Andreas Aardal Hanssen. Much optimizations have already gone in the 4.5 development tree, and more is to come. You can also expect many functional improvements to the WebKit webbrowser engine, graphical effects and a new animations API.
Thread beginning with comment 326690
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2007-02-17
WebKit is a fine piece of code and a great engine. It actually puts Gecko to shame, as far as the code and engineering goes, and it easily matches Gecko for rendering accuracy and speed.
There is absolutely no reason that it shouldn't be included in Qt or anywhere else.
There is absolutely no reason that it shouldn't be included in Qt or anywhere else.
Is there any project attempting to combine an XUL browser frontend (that would work with firefox extensions) with a Webkit backend?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xul
That could be interesting IMHO.
is webkit all that good for it to be in QT4.5 an or supported .. i dont think it is IMHO.
Webkit passes acid test 3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3#Desktop_browsers
Edited 2008-08-13 12:55 UTC
Member since:2005-07-06
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
WebKit is a fine piece of code and a great engine. It actually puts Gecko to shame, as far as the code and engineering goes, and it easily matches Gecko for rendering accuracy and speed.
There is absolutely no reason that it shouldn't be included in Qt or anywhere else.