To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
specifically, its exsposing the younger ones.
something like the aspire one is perfect for bringing to class and take notes. its so small that it do not hide the user and do not become to much of a burden, yet loaded with enough software to cope with the days tasks.
only problem i can see is that it cant do itunes (even tho most linux media players can handle the ipod).
something like the aspire one is perfect for bringing to class and take notes. its so small that it do not hide the user and do not become to much of a burden, yet loaded with enough software to cope with the days tasks.
only problem i can see is that it cant do itunes (even tho most linux media players can handle the ipod).
http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT7150747782.html
http://www.forbes.com/2005/03/28/cx_ah_0328tentech.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/22/apple_blocks_pymusique/
http://www.pcworld.com/article/120146/pymusique_author_hacks_apples...
... it is an ongoing thing. Information "wants to be free".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_wants_to_be_free
Where things will get interesting is when XP's life comes to an end early next year. Will Vista be installable on these machines?
Microsoft will probably just make an exception for XP on these devices, just like they're doing now. I don't think you can truly buy XP on regular PCs now, just can just buy Windows Vista Business with XP Pro Downgrade (as Dell puts it).
Microsoft isn't stupid. They'll keep selling XP on these machines until they have something else (PocketVista?) ready. To them, it's better than people buying them with Linux installed.
A very few of these machines offer Vista Home basic ... a crippled version of a dog of an OS that runs extremely poorly on this class of machine. Many of these machines have only 512MB of RAM.
In general, the answer to your question is: No.
More precisely, the answer to your question is: Not enough of them and not well enough to matter.






Member since:
2007-07-04
There is no question that the existence of these devices will increase the market share of Linux - ridiculous to suggest otherwise - but many people will either purchase the models with XP or try to install it afterwards.
Why?
Simple. Linux is different. It is not Windows and people are resistant to change. It really is as simple as that. There will be people who will give Linux a chance and find they like it but at the same time there will be people who will not like it purely because it is different. Fine.
There will be people who give it a chance, discover that Linux is easy to administer and find that even if their favorite software is not available, there are free alternatives that do the same job (sometimes better). There will be people who will refuse to use any alternative to their favorite package and therefore need windows. Fine.
People are resistant to change. My father-in-law is having to completely re-install his XP box. Again. He only needs the pc for browsing, e-mails and to do office tasks for his business. A distro such as PClinuxOS would be perfect for him. Will he give it a try? No. It's different, too much effort to learn (?), can't get "Microsoft" on it, etc.
He's the kind of person that given the choice of what he knows and something different will always choose the familiar. He's not alone in his attitude and in someways it's hard to argue with. It's human nature.
Also, some people will always try to install this piece of software on that piece of hardware for the hell of it or to prove some kind of point.
Linux is making headway, of that there is no question. These devices are exposing more and more people to the platform and it will gain market share - there can be no doubt about this. But many people will want to stick to what they know and are familiar with.
Where things will get interesting is when XP's life comes to an end early next year. Will Vista be installable on these machines? That is the interesting factor. People like and are familiar with Windows and as Vista gains more and more exposure and people want it on all their platforms (familiarity again) what will they do when it can't be installed on these inherently less powerful machines.
The long game may favour Linux more than we think.
My tuppence.