Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Sat 16th Aug 2008 01:04 UTC, submitted by sharkscott
Thread beginning with comment 327175
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As you can see [...], BSD absolutely dominates the uptime list.
And please note another "niche market" UNIX OS that nobody* knows anymore: IRIX. And BSD/OS, derived from the 4.4BSD Lite, just as FreeBSD.
*) "Nobody" refers to the vast majority both of computer users and oh joy oh market share analysts. :-)
As you can see here http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html, BSD absolutely dominates the uptime list. I think it still does have great impact on server market and I love to use FreeBSD for my servers
Not to Dis BSD however Uptimes like that are not normal or recommended. As well Uptimes doesn't even explain the load or actual function. as well people could in theory hack the information to give the impression it was still up and the same server even as they replace them and swap them in and out. Those guys seem to be focused on keeping that system up and running as long as humanly possible. Chances are if it goes down it will never come back up (drives may have died a year ago and still running off the paging)






Member since:
2008-08-17
As you can see here http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html, BSD absolutely dominates the uptime list. I think it still does have great impact on server market and I love to use FreeBSD for my servers