Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Aug 2008 23:33 UTC, submitted by Charles Wilson
Thread beginning with comment 327321
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Much ado about nothing
by dexter11 on Tue 19th Aug 2008 17:34
in reply to "RE[4]: Much ado about nothing"
IMHO even leaving the current dir structure intact but renaming the directories would make it more intuitive and more user friendly.
But is people really having problems with the classic unix names? Because I don't see such a thing happening.
I do. A lot of times I try to help a newbie I have to give a short introduction to FHS. Why is it better to learn what e.g. the etc directory contains instead of just knowing what's in a dir just by looking at its name?




Member since:
2007-03-06
No, because scripts in /etc/init.d aren't just bootscripts, settings in /etc don't include user settings and /usr/bin doesn't hold programs, just their binaries.
But is people really having problems with the classic unix names? Because I don't see such a thing happening.
We could just aswell rename "integrals" to "Calculation Of The Area Defined By A Function Between Two Given Points In A Cartesian Map", but that wouldn't make them any easier to solve, would it?
Agreed, but until someone comes with a good reason I'd rather stick with the current scheme.