Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Aug 2008 23:33 UTC, submitted by Charles Wilson
Thread beginning with comment 327323
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
What specifically do you see Plan9 offering that cannot be added to existing platforms and that will make it a superior platform for a desktop OS.
Take into account that the main things holding Linux back on the desktop is not the kernel, but apps and drivers.
There are several open source and/or free Operating systems out there that are working on all kinds of bleeding edge and freaky ideas. Basically they all come to the same conclusion, doing things in a new and totally different way is Very Hard and takes Very Long Time to make work well enough for regular use.
The big advantage with Unix is that it's tried, tested and most of the basic problems are already solved leaving developers open to work on new and exciting things on top of a solid platform. Not everybody wants to code their own network stack and NIC driver before they get to develop a new network protocol.