Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Aug 2008 23:33 UTC, submitted by Charles Wilson
Thread beginning with comment 327349
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Much ado about nothing
by Morty on Tue 19th Aug 2008 17:34
in reply to "RE[5]: Much ado about nothing"
I refer you to my previous comment that .fonts is a hidden directory which the average user will not stumble over.
Why should anyone(expect developers and distribution makers) care where the fonts are located? Hidden directory or some kind of magic location, like a fonts folder, are just as pointless. Just right click and select to install it, either as a system or user font. The MIME types should also handles this, and start a font installer when font files are clicked.
Obsessive micro management like this are just pointless, let the system handle it. Average users have more than enough work handling their documents and other user files to be bothered with system files. And for developers the FSH are already handles this in a logical, robust, proven and well known manner.
Edited 2008-08-19 17:36 UTC
RE[7]: Much ado about nothing
by jack_perry on Tue 19th Aug 2008 20:40
in reply to "RE[6]: Much ado about nothing"
Why should anyone(expect developers and distribution makers) care where the fonts are located?
Since everyone is so offended that I want to install fonts in a place that I can remember easily, and can't be bothered to address the actual problem being illustrated, let's try another example from experience.
Distribution D naturally installs application A to some directory (/usr/share say). You want the more recent version (many distributions take a while to update certain software after all) so "yum erase A" or "apt-get erase A" or whatever, download the tarball from A.org, and run "./configure; make; make install". But for some mysterious reason A's system installs the software into /usr/local/share, not /usr/share. You spend a while trying to figure out why A claims to have installed without a complaint while giving you all kinds of file not found errors when you actually try to run it. Eventually you figure it out, or maybe you don't.
I suppose this is also an example of micromanagement on my part?
The article gives plenty other examples, like shell scripts breaking. Also micromanagement I suppose?





Member since:
2005-07-06
I refer you to my previous comment that .fonts is a hidden directory which the average user will not stumble over.