To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That is how a high-DPI screen is supposed to look. If the font is set to 72pt size, the character cell should be exactly one physical inch. Not more, not less.
If you want 6pt fonts, then set the font to 6 or 4 or 2 or whatever you like.
And yes, I do go around telling old people that they are doing it wrong when they set Vista to 640x480 on their 20" monitor.
It's not the fonts...I can deal with that. It's the layout of everything else. It's just so big and you can't do anything about. I didn't get a high resolution screen so that I can look at the moral equivalent of 800x600. Other environments let you adjust font sizes and the like so that, if you so choose, you can make it look like 800x600, but Gnome basically decides for you that clearly you want to have terrible use of screen real estate and the only option is to hack the themes yourself. And that still doesn't fix the problem of apps that waste empty space.
Here is what I use on my Ubuntu laptop just right now (screen resolution is 1280x800):
1. Clearlooks Compact theme for GNOME (google it).
2. Fonts "Sans" (or "Monospace") of size of 7.5 points with "best contrast" rendering.
3. Toolbar buttons - "Icons only" setting.
The result is more compact than Windows.





Member since:
2006-01-02
I find that Gnome does a good job of converting high resolution monitors into 800x600 mid-90s monstrosities. KDE 4 is moving in this direction too and I don't like it. I don't understand why we have to waste so much screen real estate with crappy widgets. And here's a case where it actually does matter. I'm glad you managed to make it work, but I'm honestly surprised, because in the past, I've had trouble making GTK stuff fit on a small screen (my first Linux experience was on 800x600 in late 2004 [old monitor] and half the dialogs wouldn't fit on the screen).