To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
PROPOSAL TO OSNEWS ADMINS:
Can we have a MTBMPR (Mean Time Between Mac Pricing Row) stat on the front page? It would be interesting to track how many days we can go between those debates.
Other proposals:
MTBLF (Mean Time Between License Furores) - the amount of time between a discussion of what "free" means, BSD vs GPL style
MTBORMS (Mean Time Between Opinions on Richard Stallman) - self explanatory
MTBUBCBOT (Mean Time Between Ubuntu Bashing Comments By Old Timers)
MTBBGPP (Mean Time Between Bad Gentoo Politics Posts)
MTBFUDA (Mean Time Between FUD accusations)
MTBLIAACNDD (Mean Time Between Linux Is All About Choice Not Dilution Discussions)
MTBILRFTDA (Mean Time Between Is Linux Ready For The Desktop Articles)
I would also like to propose support for system-wide XML-style entity declarations to save space on the OSNews.com hard drives. For example:
&yougetwhatyoupayforwithamac; and &macsareforrichkids;
&rmsisaneccentricvisionary; and &rmsisagnuzealotonewindowsreleasefromsarinsubwaybombing;
&gplfreeasinfreedomsuckitfreebsdfreedomtohordedouchebags; &gpliscommunistswhathatecapitalism;
And so forth. This way, these debates could be had much quicker and it's not as if the text is anything but static anyway.
Just a...modest...proposal.
Edited 2008-08-22 21:19 UTC
voted you up for that.
I would say signal to noise is already at least as bad as slashdot or digg. The reason I come to this site at all any more is down to one mac guy, 3 linux guys, and one microsoft gal, which is pretty sad cause it used to be a hell of alot better then this.
Im about ready to call it quits, and am actively looking for somewhere with people with more intelligent things to say then a rehash of one of those seven things.
Except I wasn't talking about Apple or Macs. I was talking about the general problem of perceived value and the futility of pricing items purely on their practical merits. Sure it applies to computers, but only in as much as it applies to everything one can acquire for a price where there are two or more interchangeable choices.





Member since:
2005-07-06
That entirely depends. Even if two items are more or less of the same basic quality, one may be worth money to a person for all kinds of intangible reasons. A lot of people care about aesthetics and design for example and are willing to pay for things to look nice while it's being functional. Then there are things like clever industrial and usability design that makes the item more easy/fun/effective to use, many people happily pay extra for that. There are even more abstract concepts like certain items simply make the owner happy and content for reasons he cannot quite articulate. Hard to explain, but for many worth paying for.
Of course trying to explain any of these abstracts to a person with purely practical and utilitarian concerns is more or less impossible. So suffice to say if you don't get it you don't get it, but that doesn't make the other person stupid, they just value things differently from you.