To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don't get me wrong I am not suggesting an enforced structure for the home directory.
What I am saying is that I am only interested in the structure of my own home directory and that should be left to me.
I don't want something enforced on me like "My Documents\Music" and also don't care about underlying layout for the OS (e.g. "/usr /usr/local/ /opt").
I also hate it when operating systems like windows enforced stuff like "My Documents\Music" etc.
Not as in "I won't use this system anymore" but as in "OMG this can't be happening again".
Each time I have to deal with "invisible" .directories that keep accumulating files but won't ever never be deleted by uninstallers and "documentation" packages that hide the text files you want to read in some obscure directory deep into /usr, I kill a Linux developer.
In case you feel sorry, they should have developed a nethack version of cd so that browsing the endless dungeon would be somewhat more interesting than hacking through them.
Edited 2008-08-25 07:19 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
Personally I think the layout of the /home (or /users) directories should be empty.
It is me deciding how to keep my own files. Not the operating system. Instead recently all operating systems start to drive me crazy with thinks like "Images" "Music" "Documents" (heck, even Ubuntu started with this rubbish). Is there any serious reasons for users wanting that?