Linked by Jon Jensen on Tue 26th Aug 2008 02:53 UTC, submitted by Ryan Masters
Thread beginning with comment 327921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers
by unoengborg on Tue 26th Aug 2008 09:06
in reply to "RE[2]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers"
There already are imap servers that use databases,
one of them is archiveopteryx http://www.archiveopteryx.org/
It uses Postgresql for backend storage, this means that you can make use of the extremly quick Postgresql full text search engine to search your mail.
RE[4]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers
by Liquidator on Tue 26th Aug 2008 09:14
in reply to "RE[3]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers"






Member since:
2007-03-04
No comment.
Back to topic. I think the problem you're exposing is that IMAP servers work with *files*. Obviously, email servers would cripple if they had to zip individual small files. And they already cripple just retrieving individual messages. How many times do we get timeout error messages from Squirrelmail when we have too many messages in an IMAP folder? The solution is retrieving relevant messages from a *database*, storing them into a temporary file (single file), zipping this file and sending it to the MUA. This would solve our problem and servers would be happy.