Linked by Jon Jensen on Tue 26th Aug 2008 02:53 UTC, submitted by Ryan Masters
Thread beginning with comment 328219
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers
by phoenix on Fri 29th Aug 2008 19:36
in reply to "RE[4]: My rants with the IMAP protocol and IMAP servers"
"I don't consider 5 minutes to search through several hundred thousand messages, and 1.5 GB of mixed text/binary data to be a long time. Maybe it's because I run my searches in the background while doing other things.
I don't know any reaonable company that would accept it. My Gmail that I use for personal purpose does this job in half a second with the web-based interface. "
See my reply below. Seems my IMAP client was the bottleneck, not the IMAP server.
Even if we want to limit IMAP strictly to email purpose, it still has the huge problem of lack of scalability. IMAP server are too slow when you reach a critical size.
What's "critical size"? And what hardware is being used?






Member since:
2007-03-04
I don't know any reaonable company that would accept it. My Gmail that I use for personal purpose does this job in half a second with the web-based interface.
Even if we want to limit IMAP strictly to email purpose, it still has the huge problem of lack of scalability. IMAP server are too slow when you reach a critical size.