Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Aug 2008 22:13 UTC, submitted by rom508
OSNews reader rom508 sent us a note that apparently, Sun has ceased selling all of its UltraSPARC-based workstations, with only their x86 workstation offerings remaining. The Ultra 25 and Ultra 45 workstations, both UltraSPARC-based, are still listed on Sun's website, but are marked as 'end-of-life', with the notice that they are "superceded by the next generation Sun Ultra 24 Workstation [x86]". One must wonder if this means the end of Sun's UltraSPARC workstation line. As a proud owner of an indestructible Ultra 5, I must say, that would be rather sad.
Thread beginning with comment 328456
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86
by StephenBeDoper on Fri 29th Aug 2008 02:45
in reply to "RE[3]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86"
Member since:2005-07-06
RE[5]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86
by sbergman27 on Fri 29th Aug 2008 02:54
in reply to "RE[4]: No Room in the Workstation Market for non-x86"
Member since:2005-07-24
Yeah, that's kind of the point. Nor would you (I hope) recommend using a Honda Civic to till field.
Well, I'm not really all that partisan in this area. But that still leaves the question of what work load an Ultra 80 would be really good at compared to garden variety multi-core x86_64 boxes today?
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-15
I've seen this argument for years: "SPARC is slower but it has more throughput", "SPARC has better I/O", etc. I'm still waiting to see a benchmark, any benchmark, that can make an ancient SPARC machine look faster than a recent x86.
Also, I don't recommend commuting in a tractor.