Linked by David Adams on Thu 28th Aug 2008 17:51 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Thread beginning with comment 328497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You know, I was going to reply saying how unimpressive the Desktop client is but then I decided to check out the latest version and ...
lo and behold, it's pretty good. It has improved immensely since I tried it last around 6 months ago.
It still lacks some features we'd like to use though, such as local folders.
Many will say that you still need to support Outlook. I say this is rubbish. I've seen it with several clients who were forced to use built in pop3/imap clients in a CRM tool. The switch from Outlook went well. It can be done, users can be trained.
IMAP + WebDAV + LDAP + web services in Entourage scares our IT team witless. The amount of work needed for a small number of clients poisons any idea of moving more users off Outlook.
I would like to see Evolution or KMail with the OpenChange connector (let's hope it's good) running natively on Windows & Mac. For IT to even entertain the idea, there needs to be a drop-in replacement for Outlook - even Outlook 2001 for Mac would have made a better argument than Entourage, Thunderbird or Mail.app.
Hopefully the GTK+ and QT4/KDE porting efforts will deliver something better than we have now. I'd hope it would encourage Linux adoption too.
I would like to see Evolution or KMail with the OpenChange connector (let's hope it's good) running natively on Windows & Mac. For IT to even entertain the idea, there needs to be a drop-in replacement for Outlook - even Outlook 2001 for Mac would have made a better argument than Entourage, Thunderbird or Mail.app.
Hopefully the GTK+ and QT4/KDE porting efforts will deliver something better than we have now. I'd hope it would encourage Linux adoption too.
Hopefully the GTK+ and QT4/KDE porting efforts will deliver something better than we have now. I'd hope it would encourage Linux adoption too.
Client side:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontact
http://www.kontact.org/
(Windows clients can use Outlook).
Groupware servers:
http://www.kontact.org/groupwareservers.php
http://www.kolab.org/
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php
http://www.egroupware.org/
Lots of FOSS solutions out there, for both the groupware server and the clients.





Member since:
2008-07-08
I've just deployed a citadel box to a client who needed a fast email server, but utilized a CRM tool that had a built in pop3 client. Anyone else not using the CRM tool would just use Outlook or Outlook Express.
But, in the future, I will probably switch to Zimbra, providing the hardware purchased is quite large. Why Zimbra? Because of the desktop client.
To really create an exchange killer, you're going to need a server like citadel or zimbra, and a very good desktop client.
Many will say that you still need to support Outlook. I say this is rubbish. I've seen it with several clients who were forced to use built in pop3/imap clients in a CRM tool. The switch from Outlook went well. It can be done, users can be trained.