Linked by David Adams on Sat 30th Aug 2008 16:32 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless The day after Google announced its answer to Apple's iPhone App store, it has announced the winners of a contest wherein developers win $275,000 or $100,000 for developing a top app for Google's upcoming Android mobile phone OS. To get an idea of where the trend in mobile computing is heading, all of the top ten use location-based data via GPS. Check out the winners.
Thread beginning with comment 328599
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Kroc
by Kroc on Sat 30th Aug 2008 16:45 UTC
Kroc
Member since:
2005-11-10

"27 year old Frisian developer Eric Wijngaard won $275,000 in Google'™s Android Developer Challenge for his 'PicSay'™ application.

In an interview with a Dutch website he says he likes Google'™s SDK but 'What I really wanted to do was develop an iPhone app. The iPhone SDK wasn't out yet, though.'

Asked what he would do with the cash, his response was 'I guess I could invest it in my software company, but first I want to port PicSay to the iPhone.'"


http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/08/29/gratitude

Edited 2008-08-30 16:48 UTC

RE: Comment by Kroc
by David on Sat 30th Aug 2008 16:52 in reply to "Comment by Kroc"
David Member since:
1997-10-01

For me the big question in the iPhone vs Android battle is whether the big money and geek cred that Google brings to the table will be enough to overcome the combination of Apple's head start and what will probably be a rather chaotic hardware situation. (Android's strength, openness, could prove to be a big challenge when it comes to a trouble-free user experience)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 30th Aug 2008 18:08 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

[cliche alert]

Those who do not understand history, are bound to repeat it.

The last time a closed and controlled computer platform took on an open and uncontrolled platform, the former lost. The open and uncontrolled platform wasn't better, but it was good enough, and it was a platform that allowed competition on price AND quality, not just quality.

I'm of course referring to Apple vs. the IBM PC.

History is repeating itself. Google is offering the IBM PC in the form of Android, and Apple is still offering basically the same thing as 25 years ago.

The similarities are so striking, it's almost sad that no one is really seeing it coming. We had a diverse phone platform market. It started with limited devices - devices that slowly gained features, becoming evermore advanced. There are a lot of players in the phone market, but no one has gained a dominance yet [just like in the early home computing days]. Apple is repeating its past mistake of thinking that people will pay for quality - whereas Google took a long hard look at IBM/Intel/Microsoft, and quickly realised that people are willing to settle for "good enough" as long as it's cheaper.

Mark my words.

Edited 2008-08-30 18:09 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE: Comment by Kroc
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 30th Aug 2008 21:09 in reply to "Comment by Kroc"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

'What I really wanted to do was develop an iPhone app. The iPhone SDK wasn't out yet, though.'

Asked what he would do with the cash, his response was 'I guess I could invest it in my software company, but first I want to port PicSay to the iPhone.'"


That quote is both a good and bad reflection on Apple. It indicates that the dev finds the iPhone compelling and would like to develop for it, but it also indicates that Apple has cost themselves a potential third-party dev (temporarily, at least).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by tyrione on Sun 31st Aug 2008 05:27 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

"'What I really wanted to do was develop an iPhone app. The iPhone SDK wasn't out yet, though.'

Asked what he would do with the cash, his response was 'I guess I could invest it in my software company, but first I want to port PicSay to the iPhone.'"


That quote is both a good and bad reflection on Apple. It indicates that the dev finds the iPhone compelling and would like to develop for it, but it also indicates that Apple has cost themselves a potential third-party dev (temporarily, at least).
"

How do you figure? The person gets the prize and will focus on the iPhone platform.

Apple's not lacking Developers for the iPhone or OS X platforms.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by renox on Sun 31st Aug 2008 06:52 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
renox Member since:
2005-07-06

Or maybe it's just that the iPhone is here now but Android phone do not exist yet..

It's not easy to sell SW for non-existing phones :-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE: Comment by Kroc
by danieldk on Sun 31st Aug 2008 18:22 in reply to "Comment by Kroc"
danieldk Member since:
2005-11-18

Except that this quote was a completely wrong translation of the Dutch quote:

http://daringfireball.net/linked/2008/08/31/wijngaard

Or for those who are lazy:

Then a follow-up question about what’s next and if there will be an iPhone version. This was my reply:

“Right now, I am focusing on Android and I want to make sure that PicSay will run on the actual Android-based phone when it is launched. It is possible to create an iPhone version of PicSay, and I would like to do that some day, but there is no time for that now.”

Even more miraculous the above ended up as:

“I guess I could invest it in my software company, but first I want to port PicSay to the iPhone.”

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5