Compulsory Windows purchasing by way of PC bundles is one of the biggest hurtles to alternative OS adoption. Some people have been able to fight it: "Reading the Slashdot article about Dave Mitchell from Great Britain, who got a 47 pounds refund from Dell for returning his copy of Windows was an inspiration for me to check, if it is possible in Poland, too. This is my success story."
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-12-16
And how hard is it to make laws to *force* them to reveal to the courts. I don't have a problem with them hiding it from individuals, that's part of their rights. But - if a court of law asks to see these documents, then they *must* oblige. They can hold a closed court session if they must, like what was done many times with SCO vs IBM. Court documents from such sessions are repressed from public records. They have no excuses. I'm positive that Microsoft still engages in illegal behaviour - and they will keep doing so until a government comes along and hammers them for it. Unfortunately, all of the attempts so far (even the EU's) are just pussy footing around. Europe is too scared it'll pi$$ off the US of A, the US government is putting trade pressure on other countries not to penalise "one of its own", it's truly despicable.
The only countries with a backbone these days are Iran, North Korea and Venezuela, all of which the US would love to wipe off the face of the Earth. Oh, and I'll add Russia now - I bet the US won't take on them, shows that the US is just a bully...oh you got me started...
Anyways, back on track - the US DOJ needs to start taking *proper* action against Microsoft and other practioners of illegal trade practices. Pronto. Even if it does hurt the US economy. Morals first, money 2nd. I find it so surprising in a country that is so religious, that money is more important than morals, and even more so, that the people let it happen. But then, that's what I expect with dumb Chrisian fundamentalists. Oh, you got me started there.
I guess I should own up - I'm a extreme left, anti capitalist, pagan. And proud of it.
Dave
Member since:
2006-06-03
Microsoft have been found guilty of this in the past, and, IIRC, managed to get out of paying the fine.
However, the OEM licensing agreements with large companies are all trade secrets, and hevily defended by NDAs. So it is difficult to prove anything. There is evidence that Microsoft use fixed-term, re-negotiable licence agreements to force OEMs to play by their rules. If an OEM refuses to play nice, the next time the licence negotiations come round, they will find that the unit cost for Windows will have doubled, or something. This is very difficult to detect, and even more difficult to bring legal action against.