Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Sep 2008 19:01 UTC, submitted by michuk
Thread beginning with comment 329278
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Great Theme Debate
by cyclops on Thu 4th Sep 2008 22:13
in reply to "RE[2]: Great Theme Debate"
I'm not sure I could pick out *branding* between green and orange. Oddly enough I installed Ubuntu on a girfriends computer she changed the theme to Crux!? and has a picture of Frankie Lampard without his top, added those damn eyes and a fish and just got on with it.
You want real bad defaults she rang me becuase her fonts were not the same as the Microsoft ones in office
RE[4]: Great Theme Debate
by sbergman27 on Thu 4th Sep 2008 23:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Great Theme Debate"
RE[3]: Great Theme Debate
by computrius on Thu 4th Sep 2008 22:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Great Theme Debate"
RE[4]: Great Theme Debate
by sbergman27 on Fri 5th Sep 2008 00:04
in reply to "RE[3]: Great Theme Debate"
In my opinion, you really can't beat the "outdoors" theme, available from the standard repos, combined with this lovely wallpaper from Olympic National Forest:
http://tinyurl.com/5h4rkl







Member since:
2006-07-16
Are you high? Really! That mockup was butt ugly. It was horrid, horrific, shockingly repellent, ghastly, grim, grisly, gruesome, hideous, horrid, lurid, macabre. I could describe it as very bad, appalling, awful, dreadful, fearful, frightful, ghastly, horrendous, shocking, terrible. Should I go on? Please don't generalize. Everyone did not like the proposed theme mockup! A theme is highly subjective and it's impossible to please everyone. Nevertheless, Ubuntu has alienated a great number of users with its continued use of orange and brown. Looking at the screen shots from this article I see that the status quo will be maintained for Ibex. Thankfully, the developers of Linux Mint have more sense.