Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 7th Sep 2008 20:23 UTC
Windows Probably one of the most hated parts of Windows are its anti-piracy measures - product activation and Windows Genuine Advantage. While most people acknowledge Microsoft's right to implement these measures, many have also been bitten by the measures' shortcomings, such as server outages or false positives. Microsoft blogger Ed Bott has been monitoring WGA since its inception, and in 2006 and 2007 he didn't give a passing grade to WGA ("a big fat F"). This year, the situation has improved somewhat, earning Microsoft a passing grade - barely.
Thread beginning with comment 329595
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
hollovoid
Member since:
2005-09-21

Apple's situation is a bit different from Microsoft's.

OS X unless patched will not run on non Apple computers, and even if you do get it going, chances are there is a lot of hardware in your PC that just wont work with it, or certain features that just don't function. The only crowd they would seriously have to worry about is the up graders, and with how much they make on their hardware, I doubt that is an issue.

If it becomes an issue they will do the same, nearly every company that produces a quality (?), closed source, for profit program will eventually try various ways to make sure people aren't "damaging their profits" by illegally obtaining their product.

I mean, you wouldn't want those board of directors to only be able to take their yacht out 3 times a year because piracy didn't give them that million dollar bonus they needed to survive would you? ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

ShadesFox Member since:
2006-10-01

I disagree with your assessment of why they are different.

You say it is because the software only runs on Apple hardware. I say it is because Apple sells hardware that happens to have a different OS, as opposed to Microsoft and Adobe who only sells software. This means Apple is not nearly as desperate to make sure that everyone using their software paid for it. Instead they make their profits from iPods and iMacs. Microsoft and Adobe do not have the luxury of making money off real things.

And the status of the executive yacht is not my concern ;p

Edited 2008-09-08 04:13 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

hollovoid Member since:
2005-09-21


This means Apple is not nearly as desperate to make sure that everyone using their software paid for it. Instead they make their profits from iPods and iMacs. Microsoft and Adobe do not have the luxury of making money off real things.


This is why I said..

The only crowd they would seriously have to worry about is the up graders, and with how much they make on their hardware, I doubt that is an issue.


That is exactly why they don't care right now, but let them get squeezed a bit on their hardware profits, and the story could change. Not saying it will, but it very well could, and for many other companies it has.

and come on, who doesn't like seeing the corporate elite enjoy them self at our expense ;-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

dreamlax Member since:
2007-01-04

Microsoft and Adobe do not have the luxury of making money off real things.


What about Microsoft branded keyboards, mice, joysticks, gamepads, and of course, let us not forget the X-Box and X-Box 360. And how could we forget about the Zune?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Nossie Member since:
2007-07-31

OSX server bans invalid unlimited license serials that it finds cutting down the features until a new one is updated.

I should know because I've errrr ... seen it... yes that's it.

In my strange world, apple should owe me money for running it on 450mhz G4 cube ;) hardly taking advantage of thier OS.

I dont believe OSX client does the same although I've never seen any kinda of phone home activation other than that in any Apple software so far.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2