Linked by David Adams on Wed 10th Sep 2008 15:43 UTC, submitted by Michael Larabel
Thread beginning with comment 330009
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-17
it is funny that nvidia which has been doing this as they have their own memory manager and probably have an architecture similar in function to uxa to accelerate render. Yet, using xgl is still faster than nvidia's render acceleration, especially as with the use of a compositing manager, the gpu is accelerating pure opengl only (not render+opengl)
Only the most recent beta drivers seem to be approaching the speed of xgl (using kde4).