To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not sure what is the point of this sentence.
However, it seems clear that SlackerJack is running the 2D nv driver within KDE 4.1, and that Slackerjack found that the new beta Nvidia driver exhibits some "laggyness" under KDE 4.1, while the nv driver does not.
The only area I experience sluggishness is with Plasma.
Yet on my 8600GTS this helps out:
Option "BackingStore" "true"
KMail itself has bugs unrelated to X that make it still not ready for prime-time.
I'll take Thunderbird of that until perhaps Mailody shows me something worth using over it.
Konqueror scrolling rates are not a problem. Page rendering is dog ass slow.
4GB Ram on a Pentium 940 has OSNews painfully slow to render, yet on Opera 9.5.2 it works smooth [I'm betting this Qt3 vs. Qt4 within KDE4.1.1 has a lot to do with it still needing to be flushed out.]
Not to be outdone, Iceweasel from Sid crashes quite often, even from a clean user config and install ever since 3.x has been released.
With all the new features comes tons of performance regressions and exceptions not accounted for in prior branches.
I've been using the 177.70 Beta driver, yes it's better but scrolling with Various KDE4/Qt4 apps is still laggy and slow, resizing frames and scrolling in kmail is very laggy.
Amarok2, Quassel are laggy but not with the nv driver with them settings, it's actually a pleasure to use.




Member since:
2005-11-21
Runs nice if you dont need 3d, way better than the nvidia driver. I'm running it with KDE4.1/Xrender desktop effects, no laggyness unlike even the new beta nvidia driver.
FYI
Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
Option "MigrationHeuristic" "greedy"
You conspicuously fail to compare which Nvidia driver within KDE 4.1 and I'm sure that's for a reason seeing as the latest Beta addresses KDE's requests.