Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Sep 2005 12:39 UTC, submitted by J-S-H
A recent blog post on ZDNet contends that Firefox is not as secure as promised by counting exploits. Joseph Huang contends that severity and the number of unpatched vulnerabilites matters, not just the number of exploits discovered.
Thread beginning with comment 33009
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-06-29
The latter is actually closer to empty. It's saying "This is the best browser for my reality" where the former says "This is the best browser for all reality."
IE has gotten better lately. But really, Microsoft ignored it for years and they got what was coming: Way behind.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-06-29
like the OSNews staff is concerned about the security of firefox.
I'm just a fan of perspective. I detest empty statements such as "Firefox is the best browser!!! IE sucks!!!" because they hold no value at all. The best way to go about is, "I find [insert browser] the best because [insert arguments]."
Sadly, the latter is barely used.