Linked by David Adams on Fri 12th Sep 2008 16:30 UTC, submitted by irbis

Thread beginning with comment 330172
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
While they had this inhouse, they are forced to use their own fabs, even if they are not the best option.
By seperating that part of the biz they can now use any manufacturer they wish, be it IBM, Freescale or anyone else! (I doubt they will use intel fabs, at least in the short term!)
Member since:
2007-08-22
Well...selling of the fabs might raise revenue now, but could put AMD in a bind in the long term since they would be fully reliant on outside providers for their core business. A better model would be to hirer additional capacity in the proposed manner and keep the current capacity - thus enabling delivery sooner but not making the company dependent on external sources.
Things tend to go cyclically too - one generation likes everything in-house, another wants it all out-sourced. Unfortunately, this is not one of those decisions you could make lightly - it'll be very hard (and extremely expensive) to bring it back in-house. So it's an success-or-die approach.
Wish more business execs had better common sense, logic, etc. Sad to see AMD do this though.