Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Mon 15th Sep 2008 20:43 UTC, submitted by Alexander Yerenkow
Thread beginning with comment 330430
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why not using PC-BSD itself, then?
1. Well for one I don't like KDE 4
2. It's not as stable as Ubuntu yet
3. The release schedule is not set as well.
4. Lack of drivers.
5. Poor laptop support (Ubuntu is bad enough)
6. Can't get support as easy.
And there are a few other little things that need to be worked out.
After saying all that the guys that make PCBSD are great! They are doing a great job! I am not taking away from them at all! Most of the issues are common in BSD it's self or is out of their control (Like KDE 4)
I think as it grows as with the Linux versions I like, I will revisit this over and over until I can use it for my everyday OS.
1. Well for one I don't like KDE 4
You can add KDE3 instead of KDE4 or even use GNOME PBI package ... or from Ports.
4. Lack of drivers.
Depends on hardware, you setup is propably supported.
5. Poor laptop support (Ubuntu is bad enough)
Ubuntu scales my CPU 800-2000 while PC-BSD/FreeBSD 150-2000 (yes 150 not 1500) and in steps like 150/300/450... so which one is better here, but that also depends on laptop, laptop verndor etc.
6. Can't get support as easy.
But documantation is well written and complete so you will not need that support for most of the time, and even if you do, there are many bsd forums out there.





Member since:
2007-03-04
Why not using PC-BSD itself, then?