To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's quite true. But it's OSS development too
. They also develop, generally, at a slower pace to more bazaar projects. But, they also have far fewer people working on projects.
I suppose there are sort of steps between. And Linux (itself) is a bit of a bazaar extreme. It even has multiple maintainers (for different branches).
I don't know that I'd agree that the BSD process is necessarily 'better' though I will say its done according to this guy's idea of 'professional' and 'sound with respect to "engineering" principles.' Hmmm...from what I read of this rant, anything that would read as 'good' according to this guy's principles should raise a warning flag, given how clueless he seems to be...
I don't know that I'd agree that the BSD process is necessarily 'better' though I will say its done according to this guy's idea of 'professional' and 'sound with respect to "engineering" principles.' Hmmm...from what I read of this rant, anything that would read as 'good' according to this guy's principles should raise a warning flag, given how clueless he seems to be...




Member since:
the processs for developments in the BSDs is more professional and sound with respect to "engineering" principles.