Linked by Adam S on Tue 23rd Sep 2008 14:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 331160
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How many times will OSNews link to a Mary Jo Foley article? Don't we all know by now that she absolutely does not know what she is talking about.
I've always rather liked her articles. She reports on Microsoft, does it with a critical eye, but avoids going over the line and becoming a "Microsoft Basher". After all, there's plenty of low hanging fruit on that tree.
From Mary Jo in the comments on the story:
"""
You're right: Subsystems is a bad word choice on my part. I will replace it in the post. As far as further clarification of which bundled apps get replaced, so far I have none, as the Windows 7 team is not talking about the product -- at least not to me -- beyond what is being said in the "Engineering 7" blog. MJ
"""
Edited 2008-09-24 17:02 UTC





Member since:
2006-06-18
NT (3.51 - 6 and beyond) has got, to my knowledge, just three subsystems:
- Win32
- OS/2 1.x
- POSIX (some really ancient version)
Is someone trying to tell me Microsoft added a *moviemaker* and other crap as subsystems, that they now (if so, rightfully!) are to remove?! (though making such obvious *apps* into services seems like a bonehead idea - actually, I'd call it idiotic).