Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Sep 2008 15:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 331184
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Reverse Engineering and hidden function calls
by sbenitezb on Tue 23rd Sep 2008 20:35
in reply to "RE[4]: Reverse Engineering and hidden function calls"
... Windows is The platform to develop for.
It depends on what you mean with Windows. Win32 or .Net APIs? It's clear .Net is the future, so all hacks around Win32 are dangerous. It's going to be deprecated some day, or unsuported, whatever. Besides, your software must really suck if you need a hack to make it better.




Member since:
2005-07-06
IMHO, they're their APIs, they can do whatever they want with them...
If we were talking about anything other then Win32 APIs, I'd agree with you. However, to think that we should be grateful for documentation this good... well, it's a tad naive.
We're talking about an API that 90% of all applications (or more?) need to use. Windows is The platform to develop for. When you're API is that critical to the software ecosystem, you had better document everything and it had better be documentation that makes Kernighan and Ritchie cry tears of solid gold.