To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I would say the majority of of iphone developers have either been pretty spineless or just don't care.
The fact that everything so far related to programming for the iphone has been nda and developers just suck it up and continue developing (despite complaining about it) says a lot.
However as android starts ramping up, the iphone will bleed lots of developers if this state remains the same...
It's not about wether it was there or not, the questions is wether it's even valid.
Just because a clause is in a contract or license and you have agreed to it doesn't mean it's necessary valid.
What's the natural connection between licensing an SDK and not being able to talk about why your app was rejected from a store entirely unrelated to the SDK?
This is a stretch at best (perhaps even a violation of free speech) and a great example of how companies tries to avoid bad publicity by any means by putting insanely restricting clauses in contracts. Anyone else remember Oracle's license that stated that a review of their product could not be negative?





Member since:
2006-11-07
The first rule of rejections: you don't talk about rejections?
Apple AppStore becomes more and more hostile, won't the scare developers?